03 October 2016

S. 2040

S. 2040 introduced by the 114th Senate Majority Whip from the State of Texas, must be considered in relation to Sosa v. Álvarez-Machaín, 542 U.S. 692 (2004).

In spite of the accolades on behalf of "victims", the American system has degraded into the legal realism of the 1920s, influenced by the Uppsala School and its pro-nazi Social Democrats.

I would reiterate the statement of Vice President Taha Ramadan to the Iraqi (and Arab) youth: "fight to liberate your country".

In the period between 1945-1953 in the U.S.S.R. there had been an insufficient allocation of funding towards the study of foreign states' legal systems which resulted in certain foreign policy decisions inconsistent with Marxist Law; these matters have now been clarified, namely my invalidation of the 'nuclear deterrent' theory, and the communication below with Fatah and Hamas.

From an interview with Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri.

لمطار الشاهد الاول على بطولة الجيش وإستبساله حتى
اضطر العدو ان يستخدم الاسلحة المحرمة دولياً

Legal analyses of UNSC S/2018/146 and S/RES/2401 (2018) reveals owing to the IHL citation that nothing redeemable may ensue justifying French and United States military presence in or actions against the Syrian Arab Republic.

The State of Kuwait (voting in favour on 2401) owing to the IHRL citation is obliged to abandon the content of S/RES/2254 (2015) in international relations.

Even after the unlawful revision of the Syrian constitution the document retains references to a planned economy.

As the content of NSPD-36 and S/RES/2254 (2015) are similar the State of Kuwait is likewise obliged to withdraw recognition of the "political process" in occupied Iraq.

Citing NSPD-24, the American President abrogated his obligations under under Article 55 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, and Ambassador John Negroponte voting in favour of S/RES/1472 (2003) falsely represented the administration's intent to comply with Article 55.

القرار ١٤٧٢ (٢٠٠٣)

إذ يشير إلى أنه بموجب أحكام المـادة ٥٥ مـن اتفاقيـة جنيـف الرابعـة (اتفاقيـة جنيـف
المتعلقة بحماية المدنيين وقت الحرب، المؤرخـة ١٢ آب/أغسـطس ١٩٤٩)، يجـب علـى الدولـة
القائمـة بـالاحتلال، أن تقـوم، إلى أقصـى حـد تسـمح بـه المـوارد المتاحـة لهـا، بكفالـــة الأغذيــة
واللـوازم الطبيـة للسـكان، وعليـها، بوجـه خـاص، جلـب المــواد الغذائيــة والمخزونــات الطبيــة
والمواد الأخرى اللازمة إذا كانت موارد الإقليم المحتل غير كافية،

S/RES/2259 (2015) owing to an IHRL citation is flawed and the Socialist Jamahiriya must be recognised as the legitimate government of the Libyan state.

S/RES/1386 (2001) proffered inalienable rights.

In conclusion, the military interventions of the 21st century have been a means to install liberalism in Afghan areas under Taliban control, and in Socialist states.

Fatah and Hamas were informed in February [2018] of legal analyses identifying the Covenant of the League of Nations as a vestitive document invalidating dispositive rights after 10 Jan. 1920.

Effectively the Khomeinists in Tehran respresent a non-State actor, and, inferred of Mustafa Kamel's book, see the Introduction here, were responsible for the gas attack on Halabja. This poses problems for the regime of the Geneva Protocol of 1925, where one or more signatories to the protocol, namely Great Britain and the United States, can not expect their non-State actor to abide by Persia's signature on 5 November 1929.

Contrary to Kamel's Introduction, items 2 & 3, the Anglo-American alliance finds itself in the position of being prosecutable for the war crime at Halabja.

The United States whose court denied the Iraqi vice president Taha Ramadan habeas relief - citing an international tribunal - may find itself as a Party - along with the United Kingdom - as a component of an 'international coalition' - to a case in the International Criminal Court, concerning Halabja, though unlike the latter where the State Party's ratification or accession to the Rome Statute had entered into force on 1 July 2002, the former being a signatory but has neither ratified nor acceded to the Rome Statute.

The U.S.S.R. as a subject of international law and a geopolitical reality.

The Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR lacked shelter on December 17, 1991, under paragraph 15 of Article 109 of the Constitution of the RSFSR to vote on the resolutions to ratify the Belovezha Accords and to denounce the Treaty on the Formation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, approved by the All-Union Congress of Soviets on December 30, 1922, in Moscow.

It is a violation of international law to supply war matériel to a constituent Soviet republic.



Updates (2016-2023)