Pub. L. 105-338

Public Law 105-338 authorised for the drawdown of articles from the stocks of the U.S. Department of Defense, as subsequently allocated under the signature of President William Jefferson Clinton (16 January 1999), to the KDP and PUK, among other entities, this was wholy illegal.

The current Administration in Washington D.C. in concluding an MoU with a non-State Party as Masoud Barzani (KDP's leader) is likewise contrary to United States law, one cannot supply war matériel (or other U.S. goods) to non-State Parties, this being Private Law bills' subject matter, and, such bills are only valid within the U.S. dominion.

It is pointed out that U.S. civilian and armed forces presence in Iraq, and incursions into Iraqi airspace, and, evidently, U.S. approach to the Security Council in 2003, are without legal support.

Under what authority does the sovereign of a signatory State of GCIV have the right to abrogate his obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention?

See: Pub. L. 105-235

See: Reciprocal Warfare (footnote 1)

NB: I do not necessarily concur with the Security Council's 1993 adoption of the report of Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali and the Commission of Experts which had been established under UNSC RES 780, one cannot on the backdrop of the unprecedented in scope diplomatically terms of UNSC RES 687, redefine the component parts of customary international law; this muddle attributed to the lack of comprehension among the Security Council of historical materialism.

S/RES/1483 (2003)

Economic modifications in the Republic of Iraq, as the United States was cognisant, in possession of a priori knowledge, of intent to modify the economic system, as in National Security Presidential Directive 24, of 20 January 2003, at the time of U.S. voting on UNSC RES 1483, on 22 May 2003, constitutes empirical evidence that the Security Council has exceeded its authority under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, in the adoption of the said Resolution; the Security Council must be convened and Decide to rescind RES 1483.

NSPD-24 was declassified on 25 Aug. 2011.

The Secretary-General was without legal mandate to pursue the collection of information pursuant to paragraph 24 of Resolution 1483.

cf: S/2003/715

The statements of Ján Kubiš (UNAMI) may in no way confer legitimacy upon the occupation of Iraq.

It is incumbent upon the Syrian Arab Republic to modify its votes on Resolutions 1472, 1476, and 1490, to abstention.

A/50/153 - S/1995/263

The information of the use of enhanced neutron flux ordnance (neutron bombs) during the April 2003 Airport battle, British cognisance thereof, needs to be attended to.

A/50/153 - S/1995/263 is the document code for the pledge of the Hon. Warren Minor Christopher, Secretary of State, conveyed to the Security Council, by Chargé d'affaires a.i. Edward W. Gnehm, on the date of 6 April 1995.

The text of UN Security Council Resolution 984 recognises the individual self-defense of victim states of nuclear attacks. Therefore, the Republic of Iraq, which had on 29 November 1969 deposited their ratification of "The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons", and which since 31 October 1992 when NPT safeguards agreements, pertaining to Iraq, have entered into force, and being a victim state of aggressions in 2003 wherein nuclear weapons were used by the United States, and/or their allies, according to the text of Resolution 984, the Government and Armed Forces of the Republic of Iraq extant at the date of such nuclear threats and/or nuclear arms usages, are recognized (internationally) as the legitimate representation(s) of the Iraqi State.

This subject matter was acknowledged as being on the desk of Ambassador Sir Nigel Elton Sheinwald on 17 July 2008.

Sir John Chilcot during the conduct of his inquiry certainly would have had access to documents from the British Embassy in Washington D.C.

See: Iraqi Victims of the Airport Battle

It is pointed out that none of the cited incidents resulting in damage to military vehicles on this Internet log are attributable to the Islamic State [IS], and are the sole responsibility of the Iraqi resistance, being led by the loyal officers of the national army of Iraq, which was in 2003 disbanded by the [as defined in UNSC RES 984] coalition, but which has retained its command structure.

S/RES/687 (1991)

On the date of 2 July 2009 the United States of America added the name of the Kata'ib Hezbollah faction to the State Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organisations, nine days later, on 11 July 2009, Kata'ib Hezbollah registered a U.S. hosted website.

The United States has alleged prior to the cited July dates, that this faction has engaged in attacks on their servicemen.

The Security Council is deemed to maintain plenary authority, therefore it cannot divest itself of its decision on Resolution 687, that on this 7th day of the month of shawwal of the Arabic calendar year 1437 the Resolution's defined Coalition is evidenced as in "material breach" of the said Resolution's article 32.

32. Requires Iraq to inform the Security Council that it will not commit or support any act of international terrorism or allow any organization directed towards commission of such acts to operate within its territory and to condemn unequivocally and renounce all acts, methods and practices of terrorism;

The Security Council must be convened and adopt a resolution that there should be an immediate cessation of hostilities perpetrated by Coalition states, and recognising the legitimate representation of the Iraqi state as that government extant at the onset of aggressions in March of 2003.

See: Kata'ib Hezbollah