by Eric Lindblad
Notes pursuant to radio address
On the 9th of April 2007 an interview on Arabic satellite television of the Iraqi Republican Guard commander provided testimony that the U.S. used both phosphorus and neutron bombs during the 2003 airport battle. The Arab Ba'ath Socialist Party in a statement dated 9 April 2008 further reiterated that the U.S. had used tactical nuclear weapons during the airport battle.
The U.S. occupied Baghdad subsequent to the airport battle, officially from the date of 9 April 2003 occupying Baghdad.
Technically "enhanced radiation" weapons are the proper name of neutron bombs. All nuclear armaments involve some fission and some fusion. In the high yield weapons fission predominates, and there are other 'specialty type' nuclear weapons as the electromagnetic pulse weapon, to destroy electronics communications. In the neutron bomb the fusion is maximized and fission minimized, it is a low yield weapon. Neutrons with a high kinetic energy are released during the explosion from the components as Duterium (hydrogen with 1 neutron added) and Tritium (hydrogen with 2 neutrons added), these "fast neutrons" last about 15 minutes from the time of explosion. There is some gamma radiation released and some isotope production, i.e. splitting of atoms, soil contamination, and hence the need for terrain nuclear decontamination.
Below from my radio address is some further clarification of prior use by the United States of nuclear armaments.
Please further note these paragraphs in the text:
In the development of International Law, as amendments (proposed) to the Geneva Conventions, one can convey that – such atomic armaments’ usage is treasonous on the part of the Sovereign of the perpetrating State against his own citizens, in that war reparations cannot ameliorate the resentment of the direct victims of such armaments’ usage. That is the use of such arms excludes the normalization of relations, which is the obligation of the Sovereign to secure, according to the Natural Law School, and following the cessation of hostilities. The radiological ordnance as depleted uranium is also under such proposed Conventions’ amendments. Thus the use of nuclear arms and/or radiological ordnance is defined as a civil and not a military crime.
Though this, the U.S. use of tactical nuclear bombs, is not deemed as a violation of a treaty, i.e. the Non-Proliferation Treaty, there is the possible allocation in foreign policy towards understanding between (nation) States, and the obligation of Sovereigns to foster such understanding. In this context such Resolution’s violation is deemed as an offense against the law of nations – Clause 10, United States Constitution.
Compliments,Eric Lindblad
- - -
Unfortunately I had the limited time of one radio address, so therefore I could not lecture on Liberalism and Conservatism, had additional radio dates been available. The below presentation is on Socialism.
Compliments,Eric Lindblad
Notes pursuant to radio address (end).
KZSC-radio, Broadcast 7:00-8:30 p.m., 17 July 2008.
* * *
KZSC disclaimer: The views presented by our guests do not necessarily represent those of KZSC, etc.
* * *
My guest tonight alleges that the United States used tactical nuclear arms during the April 2003 airport battle in Iraq, shortly afterwards the US occupied Baghdad. The order by the Administration for the use of such arms is treasonous, as "breech of allegiance".
In November of 2006 an American along with some Frenchmen were arrested by the authorities in Egypt, they had been attempting to recruit individuals to travel Iraq and Afghanistan for the purpose of engaging in attacks on US and French soldiers. The plausible deniability theory of Eisenhower is not deemed as applicable here, rather the accountability all the way to the top, as with the Tailhook scandal. The Administration’s involvement in such program is treasonous, as "procurement of treason".
Eric Lindblad, who will make a presentation tonight, has in the 1980’s had contact with various Communist countries’ embassies, notably of Czechoslovakia, the German Democratic Republic, and of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. And, in the 1990’s with the Iraqi Embassy.
His speciality is Soviet science, from the period prior to Khrushchev. And also some of the Soviet mathematics from the later decades. He is also knowledgeable of matters of Soviet trade policy, and exports.
Some of the information which follows is material which members of the general populace of the former Soviet republics may be uninformed on.
His presentation might be deemed as a Soviet view on current affairs.
[I present]- Eric Lindblad
- - -
Thirty years ago a man came to lecture here at the University of California at Santa Cruz, he had lived in France for some years, and then returned to the United States, where he wrote a book on the men who built the railroads, « The Robber Barons ». I never liked much the foreword he authored in 1962, for his book, his reference to Marx – I have never come across one author from the United States who understood Marxism – Matthew Josephson, he had a sequel volume, « The Money Lords », which I don’t recommend. There was another author also, from California, who had lived in France for sometime, he was fond of the writings Émile Zola, his name was Frank Norris, and he wrote a book which is set in the Central coast here of California, the name of the town of Hollister is changed in the book to Guadalajara, the book's title, « The Octopus ».
It was difficult to decide whether this radio presentation, with the limited time of three 20 minute sessions, should be in the form of a critiqué, with the prejudices and alliances accompanying warfare, or, in the form of – towards development – which may accompany a post-war projected time.
It was decided that the first two sessions should be in the form of a critiqué, and the third session dedicated to "development".
Let’s begin with a review of the historical and political circumstance of the 18 and later 1900’s. As we know, the collaboration of Karl Marx and Frederich Engels originated the establishment of scientific Socialism.
The International Working Men’s Association or "First International" was founded in 1864, and was basically defunct by 1874, at the time of the Geneva Congress, though an additional Congress was held in Philadelphia in 1876. In 1889 the "Second International" was established.
Another development of the time – though not to detract from the success, and significance, of the Russian Revolution – was that of the Populists, these were associated sometimes with the political interests of the farmers, or, with the Radicals, as in Britain, with the formation of the Radical trend in the British Parliament, and Radical clubs, and, on the continent, with Radical political parties, the British trend advocating complete laissez faire economics. There was also the Russian Populist theorists, which Lenin in the late 1800’s circa, had criticized as being 'economic romanticists’.
The Second International maintained various Congresses located periodically in the major, especially European, cities. In Stuttgart in 1907, Copenhagen in 1910, Basel 1912. Already at Copenhagen were reservations raised about activities of especially Britain and Germany towards armaments and naval buildup, as towards preparations for a new war. Lenin, even at Stuttgart, had been endeavoring to form a Left within the Second International.
It should be pointed out here that it was Lenin who emphasized, among the other Socialist strategists, the Revolutionary aspects of Marxism. And from here, and from the body of Lenin’s writings, comes the term Marxist-Leninism.
The distinction is drawn between the non-compromise of the Marxist-Leninist with the bourgeois parties and with parliamentarianism.
The position of some of the Social Democratic Labor Parties in confronting the threat of war and its planning, was advocating on behalf of their State should war break out, whereas others opposed proletariat involvement in imperialist and nationalist wars. The latter faction was the Left, led by Lenin. This divergence of opinion, concomitant with policy on the colonies, formed the basis of the split in 1914 of the Second International. The Russian Social-democratic Labor Party and the Social Democrat Party of Serbia leaving the organization.
The Second International continued to function in some form, with the remaining parties, until 1916.
The Russian Social-democratic Labor Party changed it’s name to the Russian Communist Party in 1918, and the Social Democrat Party of Serbia to the Socialist Worker’s Party, in 1919, the latter was the predecessor, along with other Yugoslav partisans, of the Communist Party of Yugoslavia, later, of the Communist League of Yugoslavia, of which party Slobodan Milosévic joined in 1963.
The year of 1918 was also the year of the Bavarian Socialist Revolution, led by Kurt Eisner for a time. The government was established in November and Kurt Eisner was assassinated the following February. Eisner had not wanted however a Soviet state, that is a state governed by workers’ councils, or Soviets. A selection of his writings as « Die halbe Macht den Räten », half the power to the councils, is available through the UC library system, and was published in Cologne in 1969.
If one reviews the early writings of Benito Mussolini one finds reference to Eisner – "On this road was placed Kurt Eisner, that has been the greatest architect of the German Revolution", and "The members of the National Council are elected – as Kurt Eisner wanted in his discourse-program – from interested parties, namely 'associations and organizations of government and private employees, teachers, professionals, and trades’, and to this we add unions of workers, mutuals, cooperatives, cultural associations, etc." – from 'Linee di programma politico’, « Il Popolo d’Italia » , Nº 89, March 30th, 1919.
Indeed someone has once informed me that in some film footage of the funeral procession of Kurt Eisner there was seen the young Adolf Hitler.
Fascism was not a natural development of Liberalism, but rather one among other responses of Liberalism, to the rise of organized labor, that is, the Labor Movement. Further is Fascism adopting a Nihilistic philosophy as opposed to Marxism which adheres to a Humanistic philosophy.
The vulgar view of Fascism is that it is a violent or racial movement, but a more precise assessment is achieved if one analyzes the economic organization of a movement. Thus the characteristics of Fascism are that it arises from a petty bourgeois class structure, it is of a Nihilistic philosophical basis, and of a Corporatist economic organization.
This latter bears some clarification – there is a ban on strikes and lockouts, State recognition of only one legitimate representation of Labor, the supplanting of "free bargaining" with collective bargaining, and the establishment of a Labor Court.
The subject however of violence as associated with Fascism is inaccurate, or violence originated as with a polity of Fascism, if one considers that anarchists were not associated with the Haymarket incident of May 4th, 1886, in Chicago, that industrial or State interests, to the purpose of justifying a domestic surveillance of such movements, were behind the incident. Therein one finds that violence, or terrorism, in its modern presentation, as a response of Liberalism to the Labor Movement existed prior to the advent of Fascism.
It is interesting to note that the month after the enactment of the Fascist Labor Laws in Italy, the legge sindicale, or syndicalist laws, April of 1926, in America was instituted the Railway Labor Act, May of 1926, the first nationally mandated collective bargaining agreement.
If one looks on your 1040 tax form is the question of whether you receive Railway Labor Act benefits. A retired railway worker receives more benefits than a recipient of a Social Security retirement check. Indeed the Social Security system was a diluted or watered down Railway Labor Act, and consequently derived from Fascism, or a derivative of United States Liberalism’s response to the subject of organized labor.
- - -
To return to the subject of Socialism, indeed only accurate in its Marxist-Leninist form, is the subject of State ownership of natural resources.
In the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia were the State owned mines in Kosovo, which, along with the intent towards the dissolution of a State whose government was derived, had its origins, in a political party which split from the Second International, there was the interest in Western capital investments in the State owned Yugoslav mines. For these reasons were the NATO and US aggressions against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, pursued.
In the Republic of Iraq which had nationalized the oil industry in 1972, there was the intent, against that State, towards regime change.
The following is a document on the sanctions issued and presented to me by an Iraqi Embassy in 1999. I shall read the section numbers, so if we run out of time before the break, we can continue thereafter.
SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAQ A VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
1. Since 6 August 1990, Iraq has been subjected to the most comprehensive regime of sanctions ever imposed by the Security Council. Following the Gulf War, the Security Council adopted resolution 687 in which a number of obligations were imposed upon Iraq as a requirement for the establishment of a formal end to the military operations. Iraq accepted those obligations, which included the recognition of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of Kuwait and the borders demarcated by the UN, and disarmament.
3. Despite the harsh nature of the obligations imposed by the Security Council, some of which were in fact unprecedented and transgressed the acceptable norms of international law, Iraq lived up to its commitments. For over nine years, Iraq has dedicated its efforts towards implementing those obligations with the result of fulfilling all the substantive requirements set out by the Council.
4. However, until now, the Security Council has not taken any step to reduce or lift the comprehensive embargo imposed upon Iraq, despite the dire consequences resulting therefrom to the entire country and its population.
5. The Security Council continues until now to maintain a punitive approach against Iraq ignoring thereby the record of implementation. It is well-known that this approach is led by the United States of America and the United Kingdom in furtherance of their declared policy to change the political regime in Iraq. These two permanent members continue to interfere in the internal affairs of Iraq thereby threatening the territorial integrity of the country. They imposed, without authorisation from the Security Council, no-fly zones over Iraq (in the north since 1991, and in the south since 1992 which was extended in 1996) in the enforcement of which continuous acts of aggression have been committed. In December 1998, they launched a deliberate act of aggression against the whole country. All these acts are being perpetrated against Iraq while these two members continue to obstruct any move in the Council aimed at rendering justice to Iraq.
6. In maintaining this policy, these two permanent members allege that Iraq has not fulfilled the substantive obligations under the Council’s resolutions and that it continues to be a threat to its neighbours. In this connection, the central argument is based on the opinion of UNSCOM that the weapons obligations have not been fully completed. This position is totally discredited by a number of facts particularly those pertaining to the revelations of former UNSCOM employees which proved beyond doubt that that body acted as a tool of American policy, and that Iraq had in fact fulfilled the substantive requirements of the Council’s resolutions on this point.
7. It is well-known that sanctions under the Charter are envisaged as a means for the maintenance and restoration of international peace and security. In the case of Iraq, the regime of the comprehensive embargo has become an end in itself for these two permanent members, regardless of the Charter and international law and their responsibilities thereunder.
8. The military operations of the coalition forces in 1991, the major part of which were conducted by the United States forces, brought, according to the report of the investigation team sent to Iraq in March 1991 under the leadership of Mr. Martti Ahtisaari, the then UN USG for Administration and Management, a form of devastation which has wrought near-apocalyptic results on the infrastructure of what had been until January 1991 a rather highly urbanized and mechanized society. Moreover, the prolongation of the embargo intensified the said results. Aside from the failure of the Security Council to fulfill its substantive and procedural duties under the Charter and international humanitarian law, the well-established fact from the countless reports of the Specialised Agencies, Non-Governmental Organisations, and the Secretary General of the United Nations demonstrate that the humanitarian situation in Iraq is, in a word, a "catastrophe".
9. After the Gulf War and under the effects of sanctions, it is estimated that Iraq’s GDP may have fallen by nearly two-thirds in 1991, owing to an 85% decline in oil production and the devastation of the industrial and services sectors of the economy. Agriculture growth has since been erratic and manufacturing output has all but vanished. The maternal mortality rate increased from 50/100,000 live births in 1989 to 117/100,000 in 1997. The under-five child mortality rate increased from 30.2/1,000 live births to 97.2/1,000 during the same period. The infant mortality rate rose from 64/1,000 births in 1990 to 129/1,000 births in 1995. Low birth weight babies (less than 2.5kg) rose from 4% in 1990 to around a quarter of registered births in 1997, due mainly to maternal malnutrition. As many as 70% of Iraqi women are suffering from anemia. The dietary energy supply had fallen from 3.120 to 1.093 kilocalories per capita/per day by 1994-95. The prevalence of malnutrition in Iraqi children under five almost doubled from 1991 to 1996 (from 12% to 23%). Malnutrition problems stem from the massive deterioration in basic infrastructure, in particular in the water supply and waste disposal systems. Access to potable water is currently 50% of the 1990 level in urban areas and only 33% in rural areas. In Central and Southern governorates 83% of school buildings needed rehabilitation, with 8,613 out of 10,334 schools having suffered serious damages. Some schools with a planned capacity of 700 pupils actually have 4,500 enrolled in them. Substantive progress in reducing adult and female illiteracy has ceased and regressed to mid-1980 levels. The accelerating decline of the power sector has had acute consequences for the humanitarian situation. The total remaining installed capacity today is about 7,500 mw, but inadequate maintenance and poor operating conditions have reduced the power actually generated to about half that figure at 3,500 mw. Aging equipment and the continuing effects of war damages have caused deterioration at nearly every level. The cumulative effects of sustained deprivation on the psycho-social cohesion of the Iraqi population are worth mentioning. There has been an increase in juvenile delinquency, anxiety about the future and lack of motivation, a rising sense of isolation bred by absence of contact with the out side world, the development of a parallel economy replete with profiteering and criminality, cultural and scientific impoverishment, and disruption of family life. The cumulative effect of the embargo and economic decline on the social fabric of Iraq is particularly evident.
10. As of this date, one and a half million Iraqis, mostly Children the frail and the elderly, have died as a direct result of the sanctions. Approximately five thousand children are dying every month. The devastating long-term effects of the radiation resulting from the depleted uranium weapons used by the American and British forces in Iraq are beginning to take their toll on the population, the genetically-deformed new born and the environment. The erosion of the vast numbers of DU shells, the burnt-out tanks and other armoured vehicles has now seeped into the sub-soil and the water table. The radiation has entered the food chain and the latest effects of their contamination will continue for generations and will be impossible to eradicate. All this constitutes a clear act of genocide which is being perpetrated in the name of the United Nations.
11. The approach adopted against Iraq demonstrates the failure to follow the political and diplomatic means for the solution of international problems recognised by the Charter and international law. Instead, a policy of aggression, destruction and revenge seem to have been employed by the forces controlling the mainstream of international relations at present in pursuit of unilateral interests rather than the collective interests of the international community. This approach, which is evidently espoused by the United States and the United Kingdom, is no longer a "hidden agenda" as it had been declared publicly on numerous occasions by American and British officials at the highest level. This policy kept the region in a state of tension and instability at the expense of restoring peace and security, in order to maintain a firm control over its oil resources. The rules and standards of international law and the Charter have been manipulated and often violated. They have also been completely ignored when they prove a troubling constraint.
12. The sanctions inflicted upon the people of Iraq for nine years now, though harsh and unprecedented in their damaging injustice, have failed to undermine the resolute steadfastness of the people of Iraq in their determination to realize justice under international law and the UN Charter. It is in this spirit of moral determination and the rule of law that Iraq addresses itself to the collective wisdom and understanding of the organization of African Unity, as well as the fraternal support of the Governments and peoples of its member States. In this regard, Iraq demands nothing more than the application of the resolutions of the Council legally and fairly, which requires the objective assessment of the record of implementation by Iraq. Iraq is firmly convinced that once this is done, the sanctions will have no way of being continued to be imposed on the Iraqi people.
To return to the subject of Social history – in the period between the end of the Great War and the initiation of the Great Patriotic War – there was established in the 1920's the League of Nations, with its Mandate system, which perpetuated colonialism, the League’s 'Economic Council’ which sought to contain the sympathies among the East European populace for the Marxist-Leninist form of State, and the International Labor Organization (I.L.O.) with its advocacy of Liberalism’s arbitrary 'human rights’.
As one knows the Fascist aggressions during the Great Patriotic War resulted in the deaths of 24 million Soviet citizens, including 16 million soldiers.
General Secretary Josef Stalin agreed at the Yalta Conference, within 90 days of German capitulation, to enter the war against the Empire of Japan. The date of such capitulation is disputed as in the late evening of May 8, or, as a 75 minute delay, in the early morning of May 9. This would place the conclusion of the 90 day period as on the date of August 6 in the former and on August 7 in the latter. The United States, however, preempted the Soviet declaration of war on the Empire of Japan via the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima.
The purpose of this was that the Japanese had preferred – and they were negotiating with Moscow on this – to surrender to the Soviet Union rather than to the United States, as they had not respected the United States. Such negotiations were proceeding even though the Soviet Union had not officially notified Ambassador Satō until 5 p.m., on the evening of August 8, "that, as of tomorrow, that is, as of August 9, the Soviet Union will consider itself at war with Japan".
The Potsdam Conference, which delineated how Germany was to be administered by the Western Allies and U.S.S.R. following the war, was violated nearly immediately by the May 1946 suspension of reparations shipments from the Western to the Soviet zones. Primarily this was attributed to a dispute regarding import & export policy for occupied Germany, presumably production methods of items for German exports, and imports of raw materials from areas which the Western powers wanted to remain as colonial possessions, wherein the Soviet Union wanted de-colonization.
Germany, according to Potsdam, was to be administrated as a single economic unit, incumbent also was the recognition of the sovereign political process, both within Germany and in the European states which had been occupied by the Axis powers during the war, therefore the overriding of the December 1946 plebiscite for the nationalization of large industry in the Republic of Hesse by the Commander Lucius D. Clay in the American administrated zone, the Treaty of Dunkirk of March 4, 1947, Churchill’s meeting in May 1948 wherein was proposed the establishment of a Human Rights Charter and Court, a European Council and Assembly, the Six-power Conference in London where – under pressure from the United States – the United Kingdom, France, and the Benelux (states), adopted a resolution calling on 'western’ Germans to form a separate state, of June 7, 1948, the creation of a separate currency for the Western administered zones, issued on June 20, 1948, the Deutsche Mark, the Brussels Treaty Organization (B.T.O.) of March 17, 1949, the secret treaty between the United States and the Republics of the Western administered zones of Germany of May 21, 1949, recently revealed by Major General Gerd-Helmut Komossa in his 2007 book « Die deutsche Karte », the establishment of the Federal Republic of Germany on May 23, 1949, and the establishment of NATO, were all in violation of the Potsdam Conference.
In 1949 the U.S.S.R. acquired the atomic bomb.
General Secretary Josef Stalin in 1952 had offered to reunite Germany, the reason for the rejection of this offer by the West is now clear, as the (above mentioned) secret treaty prohibited the reunification of Germany.
In 1953, following repeated violations of the Potsdam Conference by the Western powers, General Secretary Josef Stalin had been considering attacking the West with nuclear arms. Lavrenty Beria had poisoned Stalin to prevent this. Following this is noted the conciliatory gestures of Nikita Khrushchev to the West, his speech at the 20th Party Congress slandering General Secretary Stalin, his statements towards co-existence, opening up Soviet markets to U.S. exports, etc.
The United States has used tactical nuclear bombs during the April 2003 airport battle in the Republic of Iraq. This is a violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 984 of April 11th, 1995, wherein the United States and other nuclear weapons States on the Security Council agreed never to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapon States Parties to the Non-Proliferation Treaty. A/50/153 S/1995/263
The firm OWR G.m.b.H., a Limited Liability Company established in 1947, which provides terrain and vehicle nuclear decontamination, went insolvent in May of 2003, the month after the use by the United States of tactical nuclear bombs at the airport battle in Iraq. The Company was reformed as OWR AG, a Public Limited Company, in Autumn of 2003, and for US fiscal year 2004 (i.e. October 1, 2003 – September 30, 2004) was awarded in bid contracts with the Department of the Army (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing), $34,221,094., and with the Department of the Air Force (Headquarters, USAF), $899,991.
It may be worthy of inquiry whether foreign non-US firms have provided the United States with terrain nuclear decontamination services associated with the April 2003 airport battle, whether such arrangements for provision of such services were made prior to the US President’s signature, his March 18, 2003, determination to Congress, that the use of 'armed forces’ was necessary against Iraq (Public Law 107-243), and whether such arrangement for the provision of such services were made with the acceptance and knowledge of the government where the foreign non-US firm was located.
Whether this line of inquiry (i.e. the assessment of the previous paragraph) proves correct would place that foreign government with complicity in the United States violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 984, and in the United States and United Kingdom aggressions against the Republic of Iraq, and with such associated liabilities. That is the foreign government would be prosecutable.
In the development of International Law, as amendments (proposed) to the Geneva Conventions, one can convey that – such atomic armaments’ usage is treasonous on the part of the Sovereign of the perpetrating State against his own citizens, in that war reparations cannot ameliorate the resentment of the direct victims of such armaments’ usage. That is the use of such arms excludes the normalization of relations, which is the obligation of the Sovereign to secure, according to the Natural Law School, and following the cessation of hostilities. The radiological ordnance as depleted uranium is also under such proposed Conventions’ amendments. Thus the use of nuclear arms and/or radiological ordnance is defined as a civil and not a military crime.
Though this, the U.S. use of tactical nuclear bombs, is not deemed as a violation of a treaty, i.e. the Non-Proliferation Treaty, there is the possible allocation in foreign policy towards understanding between (nation) States, and the obligation of Sovereigns to foster such understanding. In this context such Resolution’s violation is deemed as an offense against the law of nations – Clause 10, United States Constitution.
See also my text "Reciprocal Warfare and its Critiqué by the Natural Law School" on the Russian Internet site Iraq-War Mirror, in the Historical analysis section, as http://www.iraq-war.ru/article/165622 (dead link) redirect here "Reciprocal Warfare".
– pause for break –-
The question arises at this point as to what measures may be taken according to the Western defeat by Socialist Iraq, what understanding may be fostered in the West of Socialism.
In this regard comes the subject of Soviet science. My introduction to Soviet Marxism was not as some others, as an interest in Social ethics, I am a Conservative, but rather I had studied medicine in France and in the Federal Republic of Germany. I was introduced to Soviet hereditary science, which not only augmented my Western medical studies but elucidated them. I am referring here to T. D. Lysenko.
One can find various volumes in the UC libraries criticizing Lysenko. Basically this comes from Western prejudice towards the exclusivity of the chromosome theory as a factor of hereditary science, as opposed to the Michurin/Lysenko trend, which though not rejecting the chromosome theory (Morgan, Mendel, Weissman), recognizes also 'acquired characteristics’. Herein lies the fault of the Western biologic science, wherein a therapy is not accessible to the treatment of degenerative illness, malignancy, and immune deficiency, AIDS.
In the months following the death of General Secretary Josef Stalin, the US State Department issued memos ordering the US Information Agency Libraries in Europe to remove the books of T.D. Lysenko from their shelves.
The purpose of this was to support the metaphysical trend in science, and to constrain the sociological implications as Soviet interpretation of Lysenko’s findings.
It has already been addressed to the Iraqi Arab Ba’ath Socialist Party the possibility (following British & US Armed Forces withdrawal) for comparative research with the Iraqis and the United States, on the treatment, according to Lysenko, of intoxication from depleted uranium.
- - -
The following is a letter to the US Trade Secretary.
Secretary Gutierrez,
Well the American exports – as to Trade Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez. Driving into Denver from the East one sees American architecture. Built from the wealth derived from commodity sales, similar as the commercial city buildings of Chicago were, the delineations of which, such commodity monopolization and wealth derived [and expenditures of such wealth in later influence in architecture] is described in the first two volumes of the trilogy of Frank Norris, the 'wheat series’, « The Octopus », and « The Pit »; part three was never written.
The 'American’ brand might be rebuilt, reflective of cultural entities in the U.S., American art as reflective of interaction of European immigrants and native folk, pottery workshop of the University of North Dakota developing ceramics of native American motif (early 1900's), cottage industry of neighboring tribes of the pueblo Indians, as examples of U.S. production.
Historical examples of proto-industrial and early industrial farm implements, also for use with draft animals, for example of Amish design, not exclusively limiting U.S. exports to expressions of industrialization, aspects of industrial design and æstetics, without limitations of 'industrial mono-culture’.
The war against Iraq was entirely a commercial venture, and no aspect of law can support such actions. The American and British military, and finance of France, Germany and the Benelux states, some minor tributary states’ capital investors must accept defeat.
Further as the West has lost the Cold War in Iraq, the war against Yugoslavia is also lost. Kosovo should remain part of Serbia, and Montenegro, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Macedonia should be re-integrated into a Socialist Yugoslav state.
Political changes as part of reparations will be obliged of the United Kingdom, United States, France, Germany and the Benelux countries, and "minor tributary states" whose capital was invested in these wars.
The Zionist entity will be dismantled.
As exemplary of the bombings (crimes) at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the establishment of the Zionist entity was on exclusively (also) a market control basis.
The paternalism of the State [United States], as imposition on the populace, for example Roe vs. Wade, wherein the matter has nothing to do with 'privacy’ rights, no right of 'imposition’ of Wade exists upon the populace.
Currency, on another matter, also exemplary of the paternalism of the State, might be re-issued as U.S. Treasury Notes, the Federal Reserve dismantled. New Treasury notes might, it is suggested, be issued with nature scenes of the United States, possibly allegorical scenes, as in the former Finnish Mark, and without "In God We Trust", another paternalist exemplary.
Moralism in State affairs might be restricted to as referred to and is pertinent to the 'Natural Law School". (Emerich de Vattel)
As below from Christopher G. Tiedeman (1887), Missouri Bar Association, source the book « Conservative Crisis and the Rule of Law », by Arnold Paul, 1960.
"In these days of great social unrest, we applaud the disposition of the courts to seize hold of these general declarations of rights as an authority for them to lay their interdiction upon all legislative acts which interfere with the individual’s natural rights, even though these acts do not violate any specific or special provision of the constitution. These general provisions furnish sufficient authority for judicial interference..."
"The demand for a paternal government will be sure to modify more or less the construction of these constitutional guarantees..."
"We, who believe in the old order of things, and dread the establishment of the new, can only rely upon the popular reverence for these constitutional declarations, and on the efforts of the courts to stem the tide by courageously avoiding [sic] all enactments, which violate them in work or in spirit. This is our only means of defense against the inordinate demands of socialism"
Humanities should be developed in the United States to the level that the populace does not exhibit demands for paternal government, as referenced to in Tiedeman.
The quotes from the lecture of C. G. Tiedeman, the final paragraph, one can easily replace the word employees or labor for "socialism".
The other premise of the Soviet state, as inscribed on an arch above pillars overlooking the Black Sea at Yalta, "the Soviet worker deserves the right to vacation", Socialism’s basis has been since 1945 (regarding foreign relations) in respect of the Conference at Potsdam.
Sincerely, Eric Lindblad – June 17th, 2007.
We have here a few more suggestions:
The American 'electric’ streetcar systems should be rebuilt, which will emphasize some sociological relation among or of people in urban areas, commuters, and upon which subject one can view the film "Taken for a Ride", by Jim Klein and Martha Olson, available from New Day Films, 22 D Hollywood Ave., Hohokus, New Jersey – 07432.
Such streetcars, or trams’, energy supply can be augmented by supplementation of solar or windmill power, as for example the tracts of land by Altamont Pass in California, with its 5,400 windmills.
It might be promoted in the US agriculture, the Silvo-Pasture trend and alley-cropping, for example with the Honey Locust tree, which seedpods can contain up to 40% in sugar content – an equal acreage of mature Honey Locust trees can produce twice the amount of ethanol, as sugar cane or maize. Noted further is the criticism of Lenin of the Narodniks, the Populists, narod from Russian, meaning people, and of the transference of labor associated with agriculture industry, directly engaged in processing of 'raw materials’ in the rural areas, their transference to urban areas, under the capitalist societies.
Soviet science is noted for agronomy, but also for its mathematics, the latter has a special reference here, that is, Soviet expertise in non-linear dynamics. One can model areas for expansion of arable land, to counter also desertification, one can model cloud formation, and changing patterns of weather.
Thank You